dc.date.accessioned | 2005-05-10 | en |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-10-02T19:01:36Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-10-02T19:01:36Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015-08-25 | en |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7363 | |
dc.description.abstract | The paper discusses the relationship of different lobbies, voices, and interests to the curriculum, and argues that a neat translation between interests and curriculum outcomes is not possible, but that the echoes of struggles, which take both a material and symbolic form, are evident within the final version. The paper describes the influences of a vocational lobby, environmental and history interest groups, university-based intellectuals and non-governmental organizations, teachers-unions, and the Christian Right. It contends that there was no neat alignment of interests; they were sometimes internally fractured and alliances were unstable over time. | en |
dc.format.medium | en | |
dc.subject | CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT | en |
dc.title | The making of South Africa's national curriculum statement | en |
dc.type | Journal Article | en |
dc.description.version | Y | en |
dc.ProjectNumber | N/A | en |
dc.Volume | 37(2) | en |
dc.BudgetYear | 2004/05 | en |
dc.ResearchGroup | Child, Youth and Family Development | en |
dc.SourceTitle | Journal of Curriculum Studies | en |
dc.ArchiveNumber | 2830 | en |
dc.PageNumber | 193-208 | en |
dc.outputnumber | 1780 | en |
dc.bibliographictitle | Chisholm, L. (2005) The making of South Africas national curriculum statement. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 37(2):193-208. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7363 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7363 | en |
dc.publicationyear | 2005 | en |
dc.contributor.author1 | Chisholm, L. | en |
Files | Size | Format | View |
---|---|---|---|
There are no files associated with this item. |