Free-market economics and developmental statism as political paradigms: implications for water governance theory and practice in developing countries

Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2016-12-12 en
dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-17T15:27:17Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-17T15:27:17Z
dc.date.issued 2016-12-20 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/10400
dc.description.abstract Key actors in various developing countries are often confronted by difficult choices when it comes to the selection and deployment of appropriate water governance regimes taking into account national socio-economic and political realities. Indeed, scholars and practitioners alike continue to grapple with the need to create the optimum water-supply and allocation decision-making space applicable to specific developing countries. This chapter uses case studies to explore the utility of free-market economics and developmental statism as two major paradigms that have emerged in the face of enduring questions about how best to govern water supply systems in developing countries. The chapter establishes that increasing pressure on available natural resources may have already rendered obsolete some of the water-supply systems and governance regimes that have served human societies very well for many decades. It is also clear that national water-supply governance paradigms tend to change in tandem with emerging national development theoretical frameworks and priorities. Each nation or local government feels compelled to adopt a particular framework to fulfil its needs taking into account the broader global water policy context. While many developing countries have adopted water policy prescriptions from the international arena, national and local socio-economic and political realities ultimately determine what works and what does not work on the ground. Local realities have also helped to inform how nation-states domesticate global concepts for their local purposes. Thus, the choice between free-market approaches and developmental state-oriented approaches is never simple, and hybrid models are often deployed. Indeed, the majority of countries and municipalities rely on a mix of market economics and developmental statism to make their water governance regimes more realistic and workable on the ground. en
dc.format.medium Print en
dc.publisher Springer en
dc.relation.ispartofseries Global Issues in Water Policy; 6 en
dc.subject WATER MANAGEMENT en
dc.subject WATER SERVICE DELIVERY en
dc.title Free-market economics and developmental statism as political paradigms: implications for water governance theory and practice in developing countries en
dc.type Chapter in Monograph en
dc.description.version Y en
dc.ProjectNumber QBBBBB en
dc.BudgetYear 2016/17 en
dc.ResearchGroup African Institute of South Africa en
dc.SourceTitle Freshwater governance for the 21st century en
dc.SourceTitle.Editor Karar, E. en
dc.PlaceOfPublication Dordrecht en
dc.ArchiveNumber 9491 en
dc.PageNumber 51-80 en
dc.outputnumber 8341 en
dc.bibliographictitle Chikozho, C. & Mapedza, E. (2016) Free-market economics and developmental statism as political paradigms: implications for water governance theory and practice in developing countries. In: Karar, E. (ed).Freshwater governance for the 21st century. (Global Issues in Water Policy; 6). Dordrecht: Springer. 51-80. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/10400 en
dc.publicationyear 2016 en
dc.contributor.author1 Chikozho, C. en
dc.contributor.author2 Mapedza, E. en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record