Stigma resistance in online childfree communities: the limitations of choice rhetoric

Abstract

People who are voluntarily childless, or 'childfree' face considerable stigma. Researchers have begun to explore how these individuals respond to stigma, usually focusing on interpersonal stigma management strategies. We explored participants' responses to stigma in a way that is cognisant of broader social norms and gender power relations. Using a feminist discursive psychology framework, we analysed women's and men's computer-assisted communication about their childfree status. Our analysis draws attention to identity work. In the context of stigma. We show how the strategic use of choice. Rhetoric allowed participants to avoid stigmatised identities and was used in two contradictory ways. On the one hand, participants drew on a childfree-by-choice script, which enabled them to hold a positive identity of themselves as autonomous, rational, and responsible decision makers. On the other hand, they mobilised a 'disavowal of choice script'. That allowed a person who is unable to choose childlessness (for various reasons) to hold a blameless identity regarding deviation from the norm of parenthood. We demonstrate how choice rhetoric allowed participants to resist stigma and challenge pronatalism to some extent; we discuss the political potential of these scripts for reproductive freedom.