Public opinion, procedural justice, and democratic consolidation: lessons from the Zondo Commission of Inquiry

Help | Contact us

Roberts, B., Bohler-Muller, N., Pienaar, G., Mchunu, N., Struwig, J., Gordon, S., Dunn, S. & Gabbidon, A. (2023) Public opinion, procedural justice, and democratic consolidation: lessons from the Zondo Commission of Inquiry. (HSRC Policy Brief, October). http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/22623 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/22623 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/22623 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/22623

http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/22623
 
Abstract:
Public opinion research has, to date, provided the most detailed evidence on public perceptions of the Judicial Commission of Inquiry into Allegations of State Capture, Corruption and Fraud in the Public Sector, Including Organs of State (hereafter referred to as "the Zondo Commission") and the public's expectations of the implementation of its outcomes and recommendations. The results show that a procedural justice model applies to Zondo Commission evaluations. Trust (effectiveness, fairness) and legitimacy vested in the Commission matter for overall confidence in the Commission.
Reference:
HSRC Policy Brief, October
If you would like to obtain a copy of this Research Output, please contact the Research Outputs curators at researchoutputs@hsrc.ac.za

Attribution-NonCommercial
CC BY-NC

This license lets others remix, adapt, and build upon your work non-commercially, and although their new works must also acknowledge you and be non-commercial, they don’t have to license their derivative works on the same terms.
 
19 Oct 2023
 
ZONDO COMMISSION
PUBLIC OPINION
STATE CAPTURE
CORRUPTION
 
Show full item record
 
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)