Traditional leadership, democracy and human rights: a theoretical quagmire

dc.date.accessioned	2010-01-25	en
dc.date.accessioned	2023-08-22T19:01:39Z
dc.date.available	2023-08-22T19:01:39Z
dc.date.issued	2015-08-25	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4406
dc.description.abstract	traditional leadership in South Africa is an example of the tension that exists between democracy and human rights as defined in Eurocentric terms, on the one hand, and social group rights as theoretically enshrined in the South African constitution, on the other hand. The aim of this paper is to unpack these theoretical tensions by referring to current analysis of traditional leadership into two schools of thought.	en
dc.format.medium	Print	en
dc.subject	DEMOCRACY	en
dc.subject	HUMAN RIGHTS	en
dc.subject	TRADITIONAL AUTHORITIES	en
dc.subject	POST APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA	en
dc.title	Traditional leadership, democracy and human rights: a theoretical quagmire	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.description.version	Y	en
dc.ProjectNumber	N/A	en
dc.Volume	1(1)	en
dc.BudgetYear	2009/10	en
dc.ResearchGroup	Democracy and Governance	en
dc.SourceTitle	Affrika: Journal of Politics, Economics and Society	en
dc.ArchiveNumber	6203	en
dc.PageNumber	16-26	en
dc.outputnumber	4853	en
dc.bibliographictitle	Sithole, M.P. (2009) Traditional leadership, democracy and human rights: a theoretical quagmire. Affrika: Journal of Politics, Economics and Society. 1(1):16-26. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4406 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4406	en
dc.publicationyear	2009	en
dc.contributor.author1	Sithole, M.P.	en

Files in this item

Files	Size	Format	View
There are no files associated with this item.