Democracy and dictatorship

Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2009-09-22 en
dc.date.accessioned 2023-08-15T19:04:47Z
dc.date.available 2023-08-15T19:04:47Z
dc.date.issued 2015-08-25 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4677
dc.description.abstract This article discusses recent developments in South African politics from the perspective of a paradox, even a contradiction, inherent in the democratic project itself. Democracy requires that the people, the source of democratic authority, are considered purely as an ideal. This is precisely what is at work in the notion of 'human rights', for example. The specific qualities and character of individuals, their culture, norms, values and history, are stripped away to venerate them simply in their essential humanness, that is as a pure abstraction. The moment, however, democracy is located in a specific state, the people are transformed from abstract and essential humanity into a concrete one, unified on the basis of some or other shared characteristic or norm (commitment to freedom, investment in a particular culture and notion of the good and so on). Yet, if 'people' is really a normative term, rather than a descriptive one, then 'democracy's people' refers only to those persons who fit this norm. What this authorises is the privileging of certain classes of people, in democracy's name, within the political system. I will argue that authoritarian tendencies in South Africa's political culture are effects of the contradiction above. I will consider this tendency to dictatorship, not simply in 'totalitarian' constitutions or political dispensations, but in the heart of the most classically democratic ones as well. In this regard, I will review the American Constitution to discuss some of its 'undemocratic' features. In the last part of this article, I will consider the effects on South Africa's democracy of trying to incarnate the people of South Africa as an 'African' people. What is at stake here is the concretisation of the people of democracy as a particular people. We will see that this has unleashed an identitarian politics about the content of this African identity. More importantly, it has authorised those who claim to be authentic Africans to assume privileged positions in politics and in the state. en
dc.format.medium Print en
dc.subject DEMOCRACY en
dc.subject POST APARTHEID SOUTH AFRICA en
dc.subject HUMAN RIGHTS en
dc.title Democracy and dictatorship en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.description.version Y en
dc.ProjectNumber N/A en
dc.Volume 35(2) en
dc.BudgetYear 2009/10 en
dc.ResearchGroup Democracy and Governance en
dc.SourceTitle Social Dynamics en
dc.ArchiveNumber 5995 en
dc.PageNumber 375-393 en
dc.outputnumber 4576 en
dc.bibliographictitle Chipkin, I. (2009) Democracy and dictatorship. Social Dynamics. 35(2):375-393. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4677 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4677 en
dc.publicationyear 2009 en
dc.contributor.author1 Chipkin, I. en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record