Traditional leadership: gone and forgotten?

dc.date.accessioned	2008-01-07	en
dc.date.accessioned	2022-08-17T21:26:23Z
dc.date.available	2022-08-17T21:26:23Z
dc.date.issued	2015-08-25	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/5690
dc.description.abstract	The debate about the relevance of traditional leadership and governance has displayed the glaring absence of factual information so sorely needed to inform public policy with regard to the role of this institution. New evidence has emerged that could further inform discussions on this topic.	en
dc.format.medium	Intranet	en
dc.subject	TRADITIONAL AUTHORITIES	en
dc.title	Traditional leadership: gone and forgotten?	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.description.version	N	en
dc.ProjectNumber	TAAMAA	en
dc.Volume	5(4)	en
dc.BudgetYear	2007/08	en
dc.ResearchGroup	Child, Youth, Family and Social Development	en
dc.SourceTitle	HSRC Review	en
dc.ArchiveNumber	4988	en
dc.URL	http://ktree.hsrc.ac.za/doc_read_all.php?docid=16951	en
dc.PageNumber	8-9	en
dc.outputnumber	3532	en
dc.bibliographictitle	Amoateng, Y. (2007) Traditional leadership: gone and forgotten?. HSRC Review. 5(4):8-9. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/5690	en
dc.publicationyear	2007	en
dc.contributor.author1	Amoateng, Y.	en