Case studies of redistributed land reveal patchy results

dc.date.accessioned	2006-12-08	en
dc.date.accessioned	2023-09-13T01:44:06Z
dc.date.available	2023-09-13T01:44:06Z
dc.date.issued	2015-08-25	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/6334
dc.description.abstract	The RDP boldly asserted that a national land-reform programme would be the central driving force behind rural development. Over a decade later, this doesn't appear to be true. Were the RDP's expectations fundamentally ill-founded, or has land reform failed to realise its potential, asks Michael Aliber.	en
dc.format.medium	Print	en
dc.subject	LAND REDISTRIBUTION	en
dc.subject	LAND REFORM	en
dc.title	Case studies of redistributed land reveal patchy results	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.description.version	N	en
dc.ProjectNumber	N/A	en
dc.Volume	4(4)	en
dc.BudgetYear	2006/07	en
dc.ResearchGroup	Urban, Rural and Economic Development	en
dc.SourceTitle	HSRC Review	en
dc.ArchiveNumber	4314	en
dc.URL	http://ktree.hsrc.ac.za/doc_read_all.php?docid=23308	en
dc.PageNumber	4-6	en
dc.outputnumber	2862	en
dc.bibliographictitle	Aliber, M. (2006) Case studies of redistributed land reveal patchy results. HSRC Review. 4(4):4-6. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/6334 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/6334	en
dc.publicationyear	2006	en
dc.contributor.author1	Aliber, M.	en