dc.date.accessioned |
2005-05-10 |
en |
dc.date.accessioned |
2024-11-29T08:50:42Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2024-11-29T08:50:42Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2015-08-25 |
en |
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7363
|
|
dc.description.abstract |
The paper discusses the relationship of different lobbies, voices, and interests to the curriculum, and argues that a neat translation
between interests and curriculum outcomes is not possible, but that the echoes of struggles, which take both a material and symbolic form, are evident within the final version. The paper describes the influences of a vocational lobby, environmental and history interest groups, university-based intellectuals and non-governmental organizations, teachers-unions, and the Christian Right. It contends that there was no neat alignment of interests; they were sometimes internally fractured and alliances were unstable over time. |
en |
dc.format.medium |
Print |
en |
dc.subject |
CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT |
en |
dc.title |
The making of South Africa's national curriculum statement |
en |
dc.type |
Journal Article |
en |
dc.description.version |
Y |
en |
dc.ProjectNumber |
N/A |
en |
dc.Volume |
37(2) |
en |
dc.BudgetYear |
2004/05 |
en |
dc.ResearchGroup |
Child, Youth and Family Development |
en |
dc.SourceTitle |
Journal of Curriculum Studies |
en |
dc.ArchiveNumber |
2830 |
en |
dc.PageNumber |
193-208 |
en |
dc.outputnumber |
1780 |
en |
dc.bibliographictitle |
Chisholm, L. (2005) The making of South Africas national curriculum statement. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 37(2):193-208. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7363 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7363 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7363 |
en |
dc.publicationyear |
2005 |
en |
dc.contributor.author1 |
Chisholm, L. |
en |