High incidence of new sexually transmitted infections in the year following a sexually transmitted infection: a case for rescreening

Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2006-12-31 en
dc.date.accessioned 2023-09-08T01:43:59Z
dc.date.available 2023-09-08T01:43:59Z
dc.date.issued 2015-08-25 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7506
dc.description.abstract Studies show 11% to 15% of women treated for Chlamydia trachomatis are reinfected 3 to 4 months after treatment, suggesting the need for rescreening. There is little information on infections among men, infections with Neisseria gonorrhoeae or Trichomonas vaginalis, or long-term follow-up. Objective: To determine the incidence of new sexually transmitted infections during the year after a visit to a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic and associated risk factors. Men and women who receive diagnoses of C. trachomatis, N. gonorrhoeae, or T. vaginalis infections should return in 3 months for rescreening because they are at high risk for new asymptomatic sexually transmitted infections. Although single-dose therapy may adequately treat the infection, it often does not adequately treat the patient. en
dc.format.medium Print en
dc.subject SEXUALLY TRANSMITTED DISEASES en
dc.title High incidence of new sexually transmitted infections in the year following a sexually transmitted infection: a case for rescreening en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.description.version Y en
dc.ProjectNumber N/A en
dc.Volume 145(8) en
dc.BudgetYear 2006/07 en
dc.ResearchGroup Urban, Rural and Economic Development en
dc.ResearchGroup Social Aspects of HIV/AIDS and Health en
dc.SourceTitle Annals of Internal Medicine en
dc.ArchiveNumber 1709 en
dc.PageNumber 564-572 en
dc.outputnumber 1634 en
dc.bibliographictitle Peterman, T.A., Tian, L.H., Metcalf, C.A., Satterwhite, C.L., Malotte, C.K., DeAugustine, N., Paul, S.M., Cross, H., Rietmeijer, C.A. & Douglas, J.M. (2006) High incidence of new sexually transmitted infections in the year following a sexually transmitted infection: a case for rescreening. Annals of Internal Medicine. 145(8):564-572. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7506 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/7506 en
dc.publicationyear 2006 en
dc.contributor.author1 Peterman, T.A. en
dc.contributor.author2 Tian, L.H. en
dc.contributor.author3 Metcalf, C.A. en
dc.contributor.author4 Satterwhite, C.L. en
dc.contributor.author5 Malotte, C.K. en
dc.contributor.author6 DeAugustine, N. en
dc.contributor.author7 Paul, S.M. en
dc.contributor.author8 Cross, H. en
dc.contributor.author9 Rietmeijer, C.A. en
dc.contributor.author10 Douglas, J.M. en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record