Territorialising REDD+: conflicts over market-based forest conservation in Lindi, Tanzania

Show simple item record

dc.date.accessioned 2022-08-17T15:39:37Z
dc.date.available 2022-08-17T15:39:37Z
dc.date.issued 2016-09-07 en
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/9980
dc.description.abstract This paper uses the lens of political ecology to shed light on the causes and effects of pro-poor REDD+ induced land use conflicts. We build our study on recent theoretical work on territorialisation in nature conservation to analyse the conflicts and outcomes of the TFCG/Mjumita REDD+ project in Lindi,Tanzania. Drawing on qualitative fieldwork in two case study villages we argue that conservation organisations increasingly make use of participatory tools, FPIC procedures and good governance principles to include local populations in the creation of what we call market-based conservation territories (MBCT).In contrast to project developer's claims of win-win benefits, we highlight the mixed outcomes of MBCTs and argue that their performance-driven nature and reliance on formal governance arrangements lead to the enclosure of common forests. This inevitably causes conflicts between and within villages over the meaning, ownership and access to forest resources, especially given the importance of customary relations in tropical rural contexts. We argue that despite the extensive community engagement strategy and genuine pro-poor approach of the REDD+ project, project proponents were unable to prevent land use conflicts and risks of economic and physical displacement. The specific social, economic and political conditions shaped the implementation of the project which led to negative consequences to some stakeholders despite genuinely noble intentions. Therefore, we argue that in order to achieve more positive results when creating MBCT, project developers must better acknowledge the inherent trade-offs of markets in conservation and take the limitations and realities of local governance context better into account. We suggest a more explicit assessment of social and environmental justice in the project and more context-specific efforts to prevent social harm from conservation. Theoretically, our study con-tributes to a better understanding of territorialisation processes under the current trend of market-based conservation. en
dc.format.medium Print en
dc.subject LAND POLICY en
dc.subject TANZANIA en
dc.subject CONSERVATION en
dc.title Territorialising REDD+: conflicts over market-based forest conservation in Lindi, Tanzania en
dc.type Journal Article en
dc.description.version Y en
dc.ProjectNumber N/A en
dc.Volume 57 en
dc.BudgetYear 2016/17 en
dc.ResearchGroup Economic Perfomance and Development en
dc.SourceTitle Land Use Policy en
dc.ArchiveNumber 9331 en
dc.PageNumber 625-637 en
dc.outputnumber 8158 en
dc.bibliographictitle Scheba, A. & Rakotonarivo, O.S. (2016) Territorialising REDD+: conflicts over market-based forest conservation in Lindi, Tanzania. Land Use Policy. 57:625-637. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/9980 en
dc.publicationyear 2016 en
dc.contributor.author1 Scheba, A. en
dc.contributor.author2 Rakotonarivo, O.S. en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record