Performance monitoring & evaluation in the public service

dc.date.accessioned	2010-10-07	en
dc.date.accessioned	2023-07-23T16:07:44Z
dc.date.available	2023-07-23T16:07:44Z
dc.date.issued	2015-08-25	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4100
dc.description.abstract	The legitimacy of appointments on the Performance Monitoring Evaluation and Administration (ME) in the Presidency is crucial to its success, argues JOSEPH LESIBA TEFFO. While government should take the lead, civil society must be able to participate, and therefore the ME would be best placed within the Chapter 9 institutions framework, which is aimed at protecting democracy.	en
dc.format.medium	Print	en
dc.subject	CHAPTER 9 INSTITUTIONS	en
dc.subject	GOVERNANCE	en
dc.subject	PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT	en
dc.subject	PUBLIC SERVICES SECTOR	en
dc.title	Performance monitoring & evaluation in the public service	en
dc.type	Journal Article	en
dc.description.version	N	en
dc.ProjectNumber	N/A	en
dc.Volume	8(3)	en
dc.BudgetYear	2010/11	en
dc.ResearchGroup	Service Delivery, Democracy and Governance	en
dc.SourceTitle	HSRC Review	en
dc.ArchiveNumber	6515	en
dc.PageNumber	14-15	en
dc.outputnumber	5165	en
dc.bibliographictitle	Teffo, L.J. (2010) Performance monitoring & evaluation in the public service. HSRC Review. 8(3):14-15. http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4100 http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11910/4100	en
dc.publicationyear	2010	en
dc.contributor.author1	Teffo, L.J.	en

Files in this item

Files	Size	Format	View
There are no files associated with this item.